<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Election Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sharetheaddiction.edublogs.org/2008/10/27/election-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sharetheaddiction.edublogs.org/2008/10/27/election-debate/</link>
	<description>Creating one addict at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:48:12 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Wood</title>
		<link>http://sharetheaddiction.edublogs.org/2008/10/27/election-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharetheaddiction.edublogs.org/?p=132#comment-184</guid>
		<description>I agree we already have strong literacy and numeracy development, it&#039;s how we teach and learn them in the 21st century context that is going to matter. Comparing and measuring children against National Standards should not have a place in the future classroom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree we already have strong literacy and numeracy development, it&#8217;s how we teach and learn them in the 21st century context that is going to matter. Comparing and measuring children against National Standards should not have a place in the future classroom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suzievesper</title>
		<link>http://sharetheaddiction.edublogs.org/2008/10/27/election-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>suzievesper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharetheaddiction.edublogs.org/?p=132#comment-182</guid>
		<description>Just a quick note here to say that I have absolutely nothing against recognising and supporting those with dyslexia - I think we should have been doing this all along. My concern is with new standards and testing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick note here to say that I have absolutely nothing against recognising and supporting those with dyslexia &#8211; I think we should have been doing this all along. My concern is with new standards and testing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hayes</title>
		<link>http://sharetheaddiction.edublogs.org/2008/10/27/election-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharetheaddiction.edublogs.org/?p=132#comment-180</guid>
		<description>Education is a government funded enterprise like any other. There will always be a limited amount of resources and the question is how best to use them.

Usually there is not a universal agreement on the realistic goals for a particular problem and outside factors or problems are often ignored.

Poverty , non native speaking children ,and even the distance and hours of operation of local libraries can all affect how well a child does in school. Parent involvement or non- involvement and behaviors like truancy are difficult to correct with rules but no less important.

If all children arrived at school well dressed and fed with instructions from the parents to be sure to pay attention and returned home to their book filled homes with their own quiet study spot where they were expected to finish their homework before going out to play, then those children with learning disabilities and dyslexia would be easy to identify .Most people would agree that those children are entitled to added resources because of their problems if for no other reasons that it would increase their chances to be more productive citizens.

I sometimes think a community type center for preschool children staffed with volunteers with some training from the community where reading stories,structured play, singing songs and learning some preschool skills such as the alphabet and numbers along with the idea that learning can be fun would be a help. It would also help with the identification of learning disabilities and dyslexia at an earlier age and set the stage for interventions.

Maybe the money could come from parks and recreation budgets rather than educational funds.

Not being from New Zealand I am sure I don&#039;t have the answers. Reading the debates about dyslexia there I do think it might be of benefit to step back and and consider that each side may have some good points even if there is disagreement about implementation .

My little niche is visual dyslexia which affects about 10% of dyslexics. Dyslexia is a complex condition and I often hear people say that because most dyslexics don&#039;t have visual problems that dyslexia and vision aren&#039;t related. That is throwing the baby out with the bath water. 

I don&#039;t see either side of the debate on dyslexia as being all right or wrong. If both sides could consider that the other side has some valid points ( perhaps with modifications from the other side) perhaps a better plan could be approached from the middle even if this requires the elimination of other approaches.

Good Luck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Education is a government funded enterprise like any other. There will always be a limited amount of resources and the question is how best to use them.</p>
<p>Usually there is not a universal agreement on the realistic goals for a particular problem and outside factors or problems are often ignored.</p>
<p>Poverty , non native speaking children ,and even the distance and hours of operation of local libraries can all affect how well a child does in school. Parent involvement or non- involvement and behaviors like truancy are difficult to correct with rules but no less important.</p>
<p>If all children arrived at school well dressed and fed with instructions from the parents to be sure to pay attention and returned home to their book filled homes with their own quiet study spot where they were expected to finish their homework before going out to play, then those children with learning disabilities and dyslexia would be easy to identify .Most people would agree that those children are entitled to added resources because of their problems if for no other reasons that it would increase their chances to be more productive citizens.</p>
<p>I sometimes think a community type center for preschool children staffed with volunteers with some training from the community where reading stories,structured play, singing songs and learning some preschool skills such as the alphabet and numbers along with the idea that learning can be fun would be a help. It would also help with the identification of learning disabilities and dyslexia at an earlier age and set the stage for interventions.</p>
<p>Maybe the money could come from parks and recreation budgets rather than educational funds.</p>
<p>Not being from New Zealand I am sure I don&#8217;t have the answers. Reading the debates about dyslexia there I do think it might be of benefit to step back and and consider that each side may have some good points even if there is disagreement about implementation .</p>
<p>My little niche is visual dyslexia which affects about 10% of dyslexics. Dyslexia is a complex condition and I often hear people say that because most dyslexics don&#8217;t have visual problems that dyslexia and vision aren&#8217;t related. That is throwing the baby out with the bath water. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see either side of the debate on dyslexia as being all right or wrong. If both sides could consider that the other side has some valid points ( perhaps with modifications from the other side) perhaps a better plan could be approached from the middle even if this requires the elimination of other approaches.</p>
<p>Good Luck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: education classroom environment &#124; Bookmarks URL</title>
		<link>http://sharetheaddiction.edublogs.org/2008/10/27/election-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>education classroom environment &#124; Bookmarks URL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 07:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharetheaddiction.edublogs.org/?p=132#comment-179</guid>
		<description>[...] Election Debate Yes, schools need extra funding to support students who are failing - more reading recovery teachers, more teachers to work with individuals/small groups, smaller class sizes and a teacher aide in every classroom. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Election Debate Yes, schools need extra funding to support students who are failing &#8211; more reading recovery teachers, more teachers to work with individuals/small groups, smaller class sizes and a teacher aide in every classroom. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
